Knowledge, attitudes and beliefs towards e-cigarettes among e-cigarettes users and stop smoking advisors in South East England: a qualitative study

First published: 29/03/2019 | Last updated: May 20th, 2019

Mrs Nancy Tamimi

PhD student

I have a Bachelor Degree in Dentistry and an MSc in Dental Public Health. I have gained experience in research engaging health service users, health and higher education personnel; experience in teaching, supervision and facilitation; experience in working in higher education and I am an Associate Fellow at the Higher Education Academy. Currently, I am completing my PhD in Medical Sociology at Brunel University London. I have a particular interest in tobacco control, oral health, inequalities in health and e-cigarettes. I am also interested in doing more qualitative and quantitative research on e-cigarette use.

Aims  To explore how are e-cigarettes perceived by the e-cigarettes users and Stop Smoking Advisors (SSAs), what are the risks and benefits they associate with e-cigarettes and how do these understandings shape participants’ attitude towards e-cigarettes. Design  Face to face and phone semi-structured interviews to elicit perspectives on e-cigarettes. Setting  SE England, UK. Participants  Fifteen e-cigarettes users and 13 SSAs. Measurements  Audio recorded data transcribed verbatim, coded systematically and analysed inductively. Findings  Ambiguity about e-cigarettes’ status, efficacy and potential health and social risk was a prominent theme. E-cigarettes were viewed and used as a medicine and a smoking substitute.  E-cigarettes users’ perception of risk ranged between viewing e-cigarettes as safe products to being ‘dangerous’. SSAs expressed more concerns than users, especially long term effect. Some advisors envisaged e-cigarettes’ benefits for particular cohorts. All participants perceived e-cigarettes to be less harmful than smoking.  Some perceived e-cigarettes to be as effective as or more than other Nicotine Replacement Therapies. There was a concern of developing an addiction to e-cigarettes and maintaining nicotine addiction. Nearly all users did not agree on e-cigarettes ban in public places and some feared of stigma shifting from smokers to e-cigarettes users. Most SSAs disapproved e-cigarettes’ resemblance to conventional cigarettes and favoured their ban in public. Nearly all SSAs favoured medicinal regulation to add e-cigarettes to their prescription list, aiming at eliminating nicotine. Conclusion The proliferation of conflicting evidence has created an atmosphere of uncertainty with different beliefs and attitudes towards e-cigarettes. Reliabevidence-based information, including harm reduction in nicotine addiction, needs to be available and communicated to avoid stigmatising e-cigarettes users.

Co-Authors

Mrs. Nancy Tamimi / BDS. MSc. AFHEA PhD Candidate College of Business, Arts & Social Sciences Brunel University London Uxbridge,UB8 3PH, UK Twitter: @nancytamimi LinkedIn Nancy Tamimi


Conflicts of interest:

Funding Sources: self-funded

No conflict of interest

Resources



Download the presentation

Download the full presentation here

Mrs Nancy Tamimi


 

Covid-19

As an organisation, we continue to function during the developing pandemic.

We are following all government and Charity Commission guidance in respect of staff and reporting issues.

Our funding schemes remain open and we are continuing to programme our conferences planned for November 2020.