The publisher Wiley has lots of useful resources for researchers, educators, and professionals. Read a blog by Ben Norman on how to evaluate your research paper for publicity, edited and printed with permission from Wiley.

Journalists at all levels of the media, from the local weekly newspaper to 24-hour rolling television news, share the common traits of being perennially understaffed and under pressure to find stories under tight deadlines. So how do you grab their attention?

Here are ten things to consider when evaluating your research paper for publicity:

1. Relevance to readership/community

Who do you imagine will read and engage with your paper? Readership is the most important aspect of a news article. The relevance of your story will depend entirely on which community you are targeting. When looking at your paper consider which groups are likely to be interested. Will it generate controversy only in one specific scientific field – or does it have broader interest? Would a reader of Die Zeit or USA Today be as interested in your research as someone with a PhD in the subject?

2. Meaningfulness

How will this story affect people in everyday life? If your research is mass media newsworthy, then its ramifications won’t only be felt in the laboratory or on the conference floor, it will have a direct impact on daily life.

3. Discovery

For a paper to be truly newsworthy, it must herald a new discovery or provide conclusive proof of an existing theory. A paper which simply agrees with a theory already in the public domain is not going to attract any attention in the wider media.

4. Development

If your paper is not announcing a new discovery, is it building upon an existing story that has caught public interest? Do you have a new slant on an old story?

5. Impact/scale

How many people will your story affect? How long was the study? How widely felt will the repercussions be? Bigger is better in the world of news. A paper on rising sea levels and flood risks throughout Europe is obviously going to be more newsworthy than a drought in a lake in Wuppinton-on-sea.

6. Timescale

In the age of 24-hour rolling news, internet blogging, and social media, a story can spread like digital wildfire and a print journalist is unlikely to publish it if it has already gone around the world via blogs. News is very time-dependent; it must be new on the day it goes to print. If the news item contained within your paper has already entered the public domain then its news value is inherently compromised.

7. Controversy

What makes your paper stand out from other papers in your field or in your journal? Does it have a unique selling point? Will it raise eyebrows on the morning commute? Controversy in a news sense does not mean outlandish or odd, it merely means different. ‘Man bites dog’ is a far more interesting headline than ‘Dog bites man’ simply because it bucks the trend.

8. Source

This is perhaps the easiest factor of news value from a science perspective. All a journalist needs to know is that the paper comes from a qualified academic or researcher and from a respected, reputable journal. Reputation can be damaged by sending out press releases that lack news value.

9. Angle

The big news tends to be bad news. War generates more coverage than peace, and bus crashes make more headlines then the hundreds of buses which arrive safely at their destination. The angle does not need to be sensational. Indeed, if a story strays from fact in the slightest degree the source will no longer be trusted by the journalist or the readership. Remember, good news value does not have to equate to good news.

10. Human interest

Are the findings something which people can relate to, either through experience or on an emotional level? Will it impact their everyday lives? If your story has a human interest angle, it may be news. Thousands of magazines, papers, and freelancers are dedicated to human interest stories. Sometimes, these stories are of the ‘Parrot killed my grandmother’ variety or, occasionally, of the cheerier ‘Parrot-owning grandmother wins lottery’ persuasion. Either way they each have an ‘it could happen to me’ angle. For example, papers on why people feel emotions, the psychology behind falling in love, or why dogs develop ‘a guilty look’ all have this angle.

Content originally published by Wiley, and edited for the Society for the Study of Addiction website by Natalie Davies.

Wiley publishes Addiction, which is one of two journals owned by the Society for the Study of Addiction.

The opinions expressed in this post reflect the views of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the opinions or official positions of the SSA.

The SSA does not endorse or guarantee the accuracy of the information in external sources or links and accepts no responsibility or liability for any consequences arising from the use of such information.